tax Archive

TweetShareSharePin0 Shares West Virginia’s long road to tax relief was beginning to feel older than the trees, but after many years of efforts, the state’s lawmakers are finally taking home a win. Under an agreement reached over the weekend and pending final action in the House, lawmakers and Gov. Jim Justice (R) reached a deal

TweetShareSharePin0 Shares On Monday, in Notice 2023-21, the IRS lengthened the lookback period for refund claims for returns with due dates that were deferred by Notice 2021-21 or Notice 2020-23, which postponed the due dates for filing certain tax returns and making certain tax payments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Under the new notice, in determining

TweetShareSharePin0 Shares The U.S. Supreme Court held Tuesday in a 5-4 decision that the $10,000 penalty for a nonwillful failure to file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) for foreign accounts accrues per report, not per account (Bittner, No. 21-1195 (U.S. 2/28/23)). The decision resolves a split between the Fifth and Ninth

TweetShareSharePin0 Shares Fairbank v Commissioner  is the latest in a long line of important cases originating from the IRS’s use of the John Doe Summons (JDS) process to gather information about US individuals who had money parked in overseas accounts. Fairbank involves Section 6501(c)(8). That section provides that an individual who fails to file information

TweetShareSharePin0 Shares Most countries’ personal income taxes have a progressive structure, meaning that the tax rate paid by individuals increases as they earn higher wages. The highest tax rate individuals pay differs significantly across European OECD countries—as shown in today’s map. The top statutory personal income tax rate applies to the share of income that

TweetShareSharePin0 Shares The IRS must determine the appropriate partial refund amount for tax return preparers who it overcharged for their preparer tax identification numbers (PTINs) from 2011 to 2017, a district court held in an opinion unsealed last week (Steele, No. 1:14-cv-1523-RCL (D.D.C. 1/23/23)). The district court’s decision, issued Jan. 23 and unsealed Feb. 21,

TweetShareSharePin0 Shares The case of Park v. United States, Dk. No. 3312-22S shows a bias in the Tax Court’s electronic filing system that disadvantages petitioners in time zones to the west of Washington, D.C. Think of the Park decision as the Tax Court’s equivalent of the View of the World from 9th Avenue.  It also