Kansas Tax Reform Passes: Outlier No More
Legislators in Kansas have had enough of their state being a tax policy outlier.
After three years of deliberations, more than two-thirds of members in both the Senate and the House enacted tax reform and relief legislation Monday over the veto of Gov. Laura Kelly (D). Senate Bill 50 puts the state on firm legal standing by adopting a safe harbor for small remote sellers under the state’s sales tax and by excluding Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) from the state’s corporate income tax base. And it better aligns the state tax code with net income and provides individual income tax relief to individuals and families.
Similar legislation was vetoed by the governor in 2019 but did not receive enough votes for an override. And while related proposals were considered again in 2020, Kansas’ legislative session, like most states’, was severely disrupted by the onset of the coronavirus pandemic.
But with the state’s budget in a healthy condition—tax receipts for fiscal year (FY) 2021 are expected to come in 16.3 percent above final FY 2020 collections—legislators took this opportunity to make a series of structural tax changes, several long overdue.
Most notably, with the establishment of a $100,000 de minimis exemption for remote sellers, Kansas’ sales tax code is now in compliance with the U.S. Supreme Court’s majority opinion in the South Dakota v. Wayfair decision. For nearly two years, the Kansas Department of Revenue has made the legally dubious assertion that it has the authority to require all out-of-state sellers to collect and remit the state’s sales and use taxes regardless of the amount of money they made from sales into Kansas or the number of transactions they made into the state, and in the absence of any express law on remote seller requirements. Had this policy been allowed to continue, the courts would have had very good reason to strike it down for violating the U.S. Constitution’s Dormant Commerce Clause, which prohibits states from imposing undue burdens on interstate commerce.
Moving forward, SB 50 protects small remote sellers that make only incidental sales into Kansas by requiring such sellers to collect and remit only if their gross receipts from sales into Kansas exceed $100,000. Importantly, this legislation makes clear that sellers exceeding such threshold will not be required to remit sales taxes from sales occurring prior to July 1, 2021.
SB 50 also excludes GILTI from taxation for tax years 2021 and beyond by adopting a modification that allows 100 percent of GILTI to be subtracted from federal adjusted gross income (AGI) when determining Kansas taxable income. This will end the legally questionable policy of imposing higher taxes on certain multinational businesses operating in Kansas for reasons having nothing to do with their operations in Kansas, or even in the U.S. The timing of this change is auspicious, moreover, because had policymakers not acted, proposed changes to GILTI at the federal level could have increased businesses’ burdens in Kansas.
Additional pro-growth changes contained in SB 50 include the extension of Kansas’ net operating loss (NOL) carryforward period to align with the one put in place under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), as well as the decision to decouple from the federal limitation on net business interest expense deductibility under IRC § 163(j). These changes will better align Kansas’ income tax code with actual business net income.
SB 50 also extends tax relief to individuals and families across the income spectrum by increasing the standard deduction by $500 for all filers and by giving Kansans the option to claim state itemized deductions even if they elect to claim the federal standard deduction, which was made significantly more generous under the TCJA.
Taken together, these pro-growth structural reforms will make Kansas’ tax code substantially more competitive and—all else being equal—these reforms are expected to improve Kansas’ ranking on our State Business Tax Climate Index from 35th to 24th overall (contingent upon changes made in other states).
There is more work to be done in Kansas if the state wants to truly stand out among its regional and national competitors as being pro-growth and taxpayer-friendly, but these structural changes will reverse several of the least competitive aspects of the state’s tax code and significantly improve the state’s competitive standing moving forward.
For more information about these and other structural tax policy solutions that would improve Kansas’ economic competitiveness, see our 2019 publication, Kansas Tax Modernization: A Framework for Stable, Fair, Pro-Growth Reform.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?
Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?